Proving Adults Can Improve At Chess

A few minutes ago this writer finished reading a remarkably interesting article at Chess.com. This may come as a surprise to regular readers because I have made no bones about my dislike of Chess.com. Nevertheless, I surf over each day because occasionally they publish an article in which interest is found. The title of the article by NM Todd Bryant is: Can Adults Improve At Chess? (https://www.chess.com/article/view/can-adults-improve-at-chess)

After reading it for the second time the second cuppa Joe of the day was made in order to help jump start the brain neurons prior to punchin’ & pokin’. The story of how and why I began playing Chess as an adult will follow a story concerning an adult who decided to learn Chess at an advanced age.

When working at the Atlanta Chess Center the Legendary Georgia Ironman came to me asking if I would consider giving Chess lessons to a young man new to the game. The gentleman had graduated college and law school prior to joining a prominent law firm in Atlanta.
“Why do you ask, Tim?”
“I flared up on him, Mike,” said the Ironman while hanging his head in shame.
After listening to his tale of woe the decision was made to meet the gentleman.

It was a middle of the week when the prospective adult student made his entrance into a new world. Up the stairs we went and after taking a seat across the Chessboard introductions were made. The young man was surprised to learn someone he mentioned was known. “You would be surprised to learn the names of many people I have met because of Chess,” I said.
“Like who?” he inquired.
“Jimmy Carter,” came the reply. His eyes enlarged upon hearing the name, so I continued, “His son, Jack, played tournament Chess and I worked with him a few times.”
“Did you meet Jimmy?” he inquired.
“Several times,” I said. “He has a handshake like a vice grip while looking you straight in the eyes.”

Then we got down to business.

Long story made short, the lesson was stopped after asking the question, “Why do you want to play Chess?”

After listening to his reasons and learning everything had come easy to him up to that point in his life, my story of beginning at twenty was shared. “Chess is the most difficult thing I have ever done,” I said.

After talking a little while he said, “Maybe I have bitten off more than I can chew.”

“Maybe,” was all I said.

The young fellow stood up and pulled out his wallet.

“Keep your money, my friend,” I said.

“But I owe you something,” he said.

“Getting to know you was more than enough payment, sir. I wish you good fortune in life,” was the last thing said to the gentleman, who smiled before turning to walk down the steps and out the door of the House of Pain.

My father taught me to play Chess, a game he learned while serving in the Navy during World War Two, when I was sixteen. The first two games we played he beat me like a drum, causing me to purchase a small paperback book by Fred Reinfeld, titled, How To Play Chess. Ronald continued asking if I would like to play. The answer was invariably “No” until finishing the book. He continued asking until the day the answer was “Yes.” His eyes lit up like a Christmas tree before he produced a sinister smile with a look on his face that projected, “Dead meat!”
The man did not know it but he was in for what he was so fond of telling me I would have one day; a “rude awakening.”

Now having a clue about what to do my father was flummoxed because it was not what he was expecting. He went down in flames, shaking his head, saying, “Must be beginners luck. Another game?”

“Sure,” came the immediate reply. I glanced over at Mother, who was doing her best to stifle a grin.

After thrashing Ronald in the second game he lost it, raking the pieces off of the board, obviously mad as a hatter. It has been far too long ago for me to recall exactly what happened next but there is a vivid memory of Mother saying, “That’s MY BOY!” Ronald was INFURIATED and left the room. We never played another game of Chess. My father had to know, so he asked me if I would play a game or two with a neighbor who knew the game. I agreed, and played Bill Jones, and his son, Larry, a few games, beating them handily. Larry and I attended the same grammar and high schools. The only thing I recall is that Larry used all of his opening moves setting up a picket fence, leaving holes in his position, which were easily exploited. After learning of my prowess at Chess cousin Carl Hendrix asked if I would like to play one of his fellow employees at Eastern Air Lines. Because the way my father had reacted to defeat I begged off. That was a, as IM Boris Kogan was so fond of saying about one of my Chess moves, “BEEG Mistake.” The co-worker turned out to be a fellow named Bob Joiner, who later won the 1969 Georgia State Championship with an undefeated 5-0 score. Later Bob offered to purchase a brick to place beside the one he purchased at the then home of the USCF in Crossville, Tennessee, but the offer was declined. I did meet Bob later and after earning his degree in his off hours he became a Public Defender in Fulton County, Georgia, which is the county in which Atlanta is located. My brain contains fond memories of going to Bob’s office to eat lunch while playing Chess with a clock. I helped Bob on cases by doing investigative work pro bono. Later, when behind bars with no bond because of a sordid situation involving, you guessed it, a crazed Chess player, Bob, after returning from vacation, which caused me to suffer much more time in jail, interceded on my behalf and a bond was set, allowing me a Get Out of Jail card.

After earning a scholarship from the Boys Club I attended a junior college after taking a year off from school to work. It was there a gentleman was met, Dr. James Doig, a philosophy professor. Dr. Doig, a former Jesuit priest, had a HUGE influence on my future when handing me his personal copy of The Story of Philosophy, by Will Durant, saying, “If you read this book you will know more about philosophy than ninety nine and forty four percent of people.” Dr. Doig may have ended with, “in America, or “on the planet.” I simply cannot recall. Because of Dr. Doig I have continued reading about philosophy all my life. (https://xpertchesslessons.wordpress.com/2021/11/24/spinoza/)(https://xpertchesslessons.wordpress.com/2022/06/09/im-stuart-rachels-was-the-best-alabama-saw-in-chess/)

Dr. Doig also asked me a question that altered my life: “Do you play Chess?”

Dr. Doig was a gentleman and scholar, who was gracious in defeat. My path on the Chess road was found because of Dr. Doig. Although not religious it was also because of Dr. Doig this writer found his way to several retreats at the Monastery of the Holy Spirit, in Conyers, Georgia, a wonderful place, during a period of crisis (https://www.trappist.net/).

After defeating Dr. Doig the reaction was completely different from that of my father. He was gracious after each game lost. I am not ashamed to say I loved the man. I shudder to think of what the outcome of my life might have been if I had not met Dr. Doig. This was during a time when the Fools In Power killed JFK in order to send many thousands of Americans to their needless deaths in Viet Nam and I was involved in the anti-war movement. Because of Dr. Doig my battles were fought on the Chessboard, and not in the streets.

After handily winning a Chess tournament organized by Dr. Doig I “won” free entry into a United States Chess Federation tournament. I say “won” because later it was learned Dr. Doig had put up the money for my entry. All six games ended in my defeat. The only one recalled was a very long last round battle in which a gentleman named Al Cass won a single pawn and nursed that sucker across the board to make a Queen and checkmated yours truly. It was terribly embarrassing to inform my family and friends that I was a “loser” because they had high expectations. My father said something with an excrement eatin’ grin about my learning a “lesson” or some such. Infuriated, my life was then devoted to becoming better at Chess in order to wipe that stinking grin off of his face.

For many years I told people my initial USCF rating was 1064 because that was the first rating seen in Chess Life magazine. I was disabused of that notion when Senior Master Klaus Pohl brought a copy of my first rating to the House of Pain, pleased to show everyone I began as a triple digit player, which was in the 800’s. I had once defeated SM Pohl in a USCF rated tournament and I think Larry Evans published the game in his column, or it was published in the Recent Games column of a Chess Life magazine, which infuriated Klaus.

In 1974 I tied for first place in the Atlanta Chess Championship with a score of 4-1. A group of players were tied for first place heading into the last round and the tournament director, Jared Radin, was also playing in the event. I believe Jared had previously won the same event, or maybe even the Georgia State Championship. Maybe someone reading this will do the research and elucidate readers in the future. A player, Wayne Watson, from New York, was the highest rated player in contention. An uproar ensued after Jared posted the pairings and he had paired himself with your truly, the lowest rated player in the group. A phone call was placed to Mike Decker, one of the strongest Chess players in Atlanta, and also a tournament director. Mike graduated from Emory University with not one, but two PhDs, and was held in extremely high regard by the Chess community. Mike had also befriended me and helped me greatly on the Chess path. Mike said the pairing made by Jared could be made, but under the circumstances he should give serious consideration to making the alternate pairing. The initial pairing made by Jared stood. Everyone expected Jared would defeat his much lower rated opponent.

Some time earlier Jared and I had met Grandmaster Bent Larsen

at the Atlanta airport and taken him to the hotel the night prior to the simultaneous exhibition he was to give the next night. We were to take the GM out for dinner, but Jared begged off, so it was only this writer and GM Larsen at the dining table. Without giving specifics, it was one of the most pleasurably and informative evenings of my life. I had first met Bent at the San Antonio 1972 Chess tournament,

https://texaschess.org/san-antonio-1972/

and he remembered me, which was, frankly, surprising. Bent surprised me again by asking about how I got into Chess and my strength, etc. To make a long story short, the time spent with Bent affected my play immensely. Bent was known for playing 1 b3 to begin a game, and it was discussed at length over drinks. Bent beat me like a drum in the simultaneous exhibition. I also lost to Jude Acers in a simul, but managed to defeat him at the World Chess Table in New Orleans some years later.

https://judeacers.com/?p=1577

Let us return to the last round game of the 1974 Atlanta Chess Championship. Wayne Watson won his game handily and it did not take much time.

The white pieces were mine versus Jared and the game was opened with 1 b3. It was a very long game. When Jared extended his hand I became the 1974 Atlanta Chess Champion because Mr. Watson was from New York and ineligible for the honor. Players were saying, “Can you believe it? We now have a class B player for Champion.”

There was no Atlanta Chess Championship in 1975. The next ACC was in 1976 and it was won with a 5-0 score. Two of the players defeated were Justin Morrison, who owns Kid Chess (https://www.kidchess.com/) here in Atlanta, and his father, Earle Morrison, in the last round game. It was the high water mark of my Chess career.

After discovering Gammons (see previous post https://xpertchesslessons.wordpress.com/2023/11/16/the-new-kid-in-town/) and then leaving Chess for several years, I was never the same player although I did increase my rating to over 2000 during a time when the rating system was down and followed by a period of rating deflation. The Legendary one mentioned that if the adjustments had not been made and the bonus points were still in effect I would have made it over the 2100 hurdle. Be that as it may, because of having Aphantasia (https://xpertchesslessons.wordpress.com/2023/05/26/aphantasia/) it is more than a little obvious I would never have become a National Master. This writer can be content knowing he derived about as much out of Chess as possible under the circumstances.

Expert James Altucher Plays “The Truth”

Expert James Altucher relocated from up north in New York to the Great State of Georgia down South. Knowing nothing about the gentleman I have spent an inordinate amount of time researching the interloper. The results are interesting. What follows is an indication:

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/what-you-can-do-if-you-are-a-nobody-james-altucher–178455203956029492/

After learning the Yankee had won the Georgia Senior Chess Championship I inquired as to who was the guy? “You know, the dude with all the HAIR!” Actually, I did not know that…

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRQlx2klE_aNrPhz2OyKRdg

Origins notwithstanding the fact is we share some openings, as is the case with the game that follows. Regular readers know of my fondness for “The truth-as it was known in those far-off days.” If you do not know from where that emanates then please type “Bishops Opening” into the rectangle provided and all the posts concerning The Truth will magically appear. Then there is the fact that Altucher plays the Dutch, although not the Leningrad Dutch, which was the only reason I played the Dutch defense. 365Chess.com has the particular move order in the game listed as a C28 Vienna game. Lichess.org considers it to be a C24 Bishop’s Opening: Vienna Hybrid. As far as this writer is concerned any game beginning with 1 e4 e5 2 Bc4 is a Bishops Opening.

When Karl Demelt sat down to face the B.O. he, like James Altucher, had won both of his games.

Expert James Altucher (2000) vs FM Karl Dehmelt (2203)
Irwin Tournament of Senior Champions
Bishop’s Opening: Vienna Hybrid (Lichess.org)

  1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. d3 Na5 5. Nge2 Bc5 6. Na4 Be7 7. Ng3 d5 8. exd5 Nxd5 9. Bxd5 Qxd5 10. O-O Be6 11. Nc3 Qd7 12. f4 exf4 13. Bxf4 O-O 14. Qd2 Nc6 15. Kh1 Nd4 16. Nce4 f5 17. Nc3 Bd6 18. Bxd6 Qxd6 19. Nge2 Rae8 20. Rae1 g6 21. Nxd4 Qxd4 22. a3 Bd7 23. Nd1 Bc6 24. c3 Qd6 25. d4 Rxe1 26. Rxe1 f4 27. c4 f3 28. d5 Bd7 29. b4 b6 30. Nf2 fxg2+ 31. Kxg2 Qf6 32. Qe3 Re8 33. Ne4 Qe5 34. Qf3 Kg7 35. Re2 Qd4 36. Nf2 Qxc4 37. Rxe8 Bxe8 38. Ne4 Qd4 39. Kg3 Bf7 40. Qf4 Qxd5 41. Qf6+ Kg8 42. Qe7 Qe6 43. Nf6+ Kg7 44. Ne8+ Kg8 45. Nf6+ Kg7 46. Ne8+ Kh8 47. Qf8+ Bg8 48. Qe7 1/2-1/2

1.e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nc6 (The usual move is 2…Nf6 and it has been played almost five times as frequently than the move made in the game. It is also the first choice of the Stockfish program at lichess.org) 3. Nc3 (‘Back in the day’ I would have played 3 d3, and so will the ‘Fish today) 3…Nf6 4. d3 Na5 5. Nge2 (The only move ever played when playing the Bishop’s opening was 5 Bb3. Although I love the bishops the fact is white obtains excellent compensation because of the time lost by black, which can have a deleterious affect on the black position. In addition, the opening of the rook file help white, and the pawn captured toward the center, which could have a positive effect later. What’s not to like?!) 5… Bc5 (SF would first play 5…c6, and after 6 0-0, then play Bc5) 6. Na4 (Turn about is fair play, eh? I would have dripped the prelate back to b3. SF will castle) 6…Be7 7. Ng3 (SF agrees with me and would return the knight to c3) 7…d5 (SF would first prepare this move with 7…c6) 8. exd5 Nxd5 9. Bxd5 (There is no way I would even consider taking the steed with the powerful white squared bishop. Like the ‘Fish, I, too, would simply castle) Qxd5 10. O-O Be6 Qxd5 10. O-O Be6 11. Nc3 Qd7 12. f4 exf4 13. Bxf4 (Each and everyone of these moves would have been made by Stockfish) 13…O-O (SF would go the other way with 13…0-0-0) 14. Qd2 (SF goes with 14 Nce4) 14…Nc6 15. Kh1 (SF says 15 Rae1) 15…Nd4 (b6 SF) 16. Nce4 f5 (16…c5 SF) 17. Nc3 (If there is one thing learned from watching the ‘Fish do its thing it is that the program will, given the chance, almost always ATTACK SOMETHING. It will come as no surprise to you that the ‘Fish would move the knight to g5. Black, without question, now has the advantage) 17…Bd6 (Which he tosses away with this ill-fated move. SF would simply play 17…h6) 18. Bxd6 (18 Nce2 SF) 18….Qxd6 19. Nge2 Rae8 20. Rae1 (SF is ready to get some wood offa the board, preferring to take the intruding knight and after the Queen takes the knight, will play 21 Qf2, getting the Ladies offa the board with a view to at least making a draw).

We move along to this position:

Position after 34…Kg7

Althucher played 32 Re2?? The question marks are from lichess.org.

Position after 32 Re2??

Fortunately for the new kid in town

his opponent answered a double question mark ‘howler’ with one of his own when playing 35…Qd4?? (SF awarded)

Position after 35…Qd4??

Not to be outdone, the hirsute one answered with:

Position after 36 Nf2?? (SF again)

From here on it was down and out for the new ‘kid’ in town…or was it?

Position after 42 Qe7

Demelt now had a completely won position. All he needed to do was move the King to g7…

Position after 42…Qe6??

After 43. Nf6+ Kg7 44. Ne8+ Kg8 45. Nf6+ Kg7 46. Ne8+ the position looked like this:

Position after 46 Ne8+

And the game did not end in a perpetual check because Karl Demelt, in his wisdom, moved his King to h8 with his 46th move, which allowed Althucher to play 47 Qf8+, and after 47…Bg8 checkmate was NOT DELIVERED!!! James Altucher played 48 Ke7?? and the game was agreed drawn. I cannot make this up, people… That is the truth.

Stephen J Pullinger (2110) vs Gavin Wall (2369)
Event: Sutton op
Site: Sutton Date: ??/??/1999
Round: 1 Score: 0-1
ECO: C28 Vienna game
1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d3 Na5 5.Nge2 Bc5 6.Na4 Be7 7.Nac3 O-O 8.O-O c6 9.a3 Nxc4 10.dxc4 d6 11.Qd3 Be6 12.Bg5 h6 13.Bxf6 Bxf6 14.Rad1 Qa5 15.Kh1 Rfd8 16.f4 exf4 17.Nxf4 Bg4 18.Rd2 Be5 19.Nd1 Bxd1 20.Rdxd1 Bxb2 21.Rb1 Qxa3 22.Qxa3 Bxa3 23.Rxb7 Rdb8 24.Rfb1 Rxb7 25.Rxb7 a5 26.Rb3 Bc5 27.Nd3 a4 28.Rb1 a3 29.Nxc5 dxc5 30.Kg1 Kf8 31.Kf2 a2 32.Ra1 Ke7 33.Ke3 Ke6 0-1
https://www.365chess.com/game.php?back=1&gid=778982&m=12

UFOs In Georgia

Out There Somewhere


UFO display in Sardis follows close encounter

by: George Eskola

Posted: Apr 28, 2023 / 06:32 PM EDT

SARDIS, Ga. (WJBF) – This is not a scene from a Sci-Fi movie…it’s Danny’s Nelson’s yard in Sardis, where he has his own Area 51.

“I put these things together…that was really similar to the ship that I saw,” he said.

Yes, Danny’s UFO display was inspired in part by what he saw in the sky back in the 1980’s…

“I had been coming from work in Waynesboro one day and something looked about the length of a big jet airplane but it was cigar shaped, “he said.

Now that could prompt one to create this UFO display, but Danny says he had a closer encounter a few years later in Sardis.

“I’ve been in there and I have been examined and they’re very nice to me. I was elevated from the truck out,” Danny said.
ALSO ON WJBF: 60’s era ‘fallout shelter’ signs still hang out in Warrenton

Danny says he had a face-to-face encounter with aliens.

They are gray, he says, not green. And they’re nice but curious.

“He said he’s not there to harm me. He wanted to do an examination, I was going to be probed,” Danny said.

Danny’s display is far out, the story seems far-fetched.

“This sounds crazy.”

“It does, it sounds crazy, but the crazy ones are going to be the ones who don’t believe,” he said.

Jack Johnson has known Danny for more than 40 years.

“Yes sir. I believe his story. He never lied to me, just because it does not sound real. It is real,” said Jack.

https://www.wjbf.com/news/out-there-somewhere/ufo-display-in-sardis-follows-close-encounter/

Area 51 in Sardis, Georgia.

“Yes sir, that’s exactly right. It sounds funny, it sounds crazy. People got to realize there’s something out there,” he said.

And this display qualifies.

Out There Somewhere in Sardis, George Eskola WJBF NewsChannel 6. (https://www.wjbf.com/news/out-there-somewhere/ufo-display-in-sardis-follows-close-encounter/)

In 1969, Jimmy Carter saw a UFO in Georgia. Here’s what happened.

By Shannen Sharpe
Published March 23, 2023

COLUMBUS, Ga. – President Jimmy Carter was convinced he saw an unidentified flying object (UFO) in 1969. He didn’t file a report until 1973 when an agency called the International UFO Bureau sent him a form to fill out.

According to the form on file at The Jimmy Carter Presidential Library and Museum, President Carter filled it out by hand when he was serving as governor. A second agency, the National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP), had a similar form with typed responses dated the same as the one filled out by Mr. Carter on September 18, 1973.
Where did Jimmy Carter see a UFO?

The president wrote he made the observation in the small South Georgia town of Leary, about an hour and a half south of Columbus. In both forms, he wrote that 10 other members of the Leary Georgia Lions Club also saw the UFO. It was shortly after dark, around 7:15 p.m. he wrote they were waiting for a meeting that was set to begin at 7:30 p.m. when the bright object caught their attention.
What did he see?

In both sighting forms, the president didn’t provide a definitive answer as to what he believed he saw. He described an anomalous ball of light that changed size, brightness, and color over a period of 10–12 minutes. He didn’t hear anything coming from it, no whirl of a helicopter or buzz of an engine.

As for the location in the sky, he says stars were visible but not the sun and moon. The object was approximately 30° above the horizon. He wrote, “[it was] about the same as moon, maybe a little smaller. [The object] varied from brighter/larger than [a] planet to [the] apparent size of [the] moon.”

It was difficult for Mr. Carter to describe the proximity of the object, writing it was as close as 300 yards at times and as far as 1,000 yards at others. The UFO was self-luminous. In the president’s own words, “[The object] seemed to move toward us from a distance, stopped-moved partially away-returned, then departed. Bluish at first, then reddish, luminous, not solid.” After nearly 15 minutes, the president said the object “moved to a distance, then disappeared.”
2007 interview about UFO sighting

The president spoke about the UFO and what he learned while serving as Commander in Chief during a 2007 interview with the podcast “The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe.”

After nearly four decades at the time, Mr. Carter still wasn’t sure what he thought he saw. He did mention the large military base nearby at Fort Benning. He told the podcasters most of the witnesses that evening back in 1969 believed it to be some device being tested. However, the president said he’d never been able to assess exactly what it might’ve been.

Jimmy Carter Presidential Library
@CarterLibrary
·
Follow
“I have never thought there was any extraterrestrial involvement but surmised that it was some kind of military balloon or other device from nearby Fort Benning … ” JC, A Full Life, p. 197
Snake Nation Press
@SnakeHandlers
In October of 1969, Jimmy Carter @CarterLibrary experienced a UFO sighting in Leary, Georgia. In this singular Dispatch by @JamesCalemine we travel back to that night.
http://snakenation.press/georgia-ufo-di

https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/jimmy-carter-ufo-sighting

The podcasters asked the president whether he pursued the government’s knowledge of UFOs during his time in office. Mr. Carter said, “I can’t respond to that.”

When the hosts pressed by asking whether the government is hiding information about UFOs, the president said, “So far as I know, they’re not hiding information.”
Carter’s credibility

Carter’s education lends further credibility to his reports. In his official bio on the Carter Center’s website, it says he attended Georgia Southwestern College and the Georgia Institute of Technology and received a B.S. degree from the United States Naval Academy in 1946. Mr. Carter took graduate work at Union College in reactor technology and nuclear physics in Schenectady, New York while on assignment for the Navy’s nuclear submarine program.
https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/jimmy-carter-ufo-sighting

To Kingdom Come: A Review

A disclaimer to begin this review. I am not an “artsy-fartsy” kinda guy. The art exhibits to which I have been were all in the company of a woman. Half a century ago a young lady was accompanied to a place in San Francisco to see an exhibit of Maxfield Parrish

prabook.com

paintings. The experience is still indelibly etched into my memory. Blue has always been my favorite color and the vibrant blue hues of his paintings were amazing. The paintings found in books seem pale in comparison to seeing the paintings up close and personal.

https://www.sfheritage.org/news/palace-hotel-announces-removal-of-treasured-maxfield-parrish-painting/

Prior to the pandemic I read something about an author, Claudia Riess, “a Vassar graduate, has worked in the editorial departments of The New Yorker and Holt, Rinehart and Winston, and has edited several art history monographs,” who had written about the death of World Chess Champion Alexander Alekhine,

https://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/alekhine3.html

so I reached out only to learn Chess played a small role in the books she had already written, and was still writing. She sent me the first three books of a series of four books but they were misplaced during the pandemic. It was only years later the unopened package was discovered. After again contacting Claudia she sent the fourth book of the series, suggesting I review it first, as it is her latest effort in “An Art History Mystery” series. The title is, “To Kingdom Come.”

The first read was the last book of the series.

The truth is my taste in reading art books has been more along the lines of, The Gardner Heist: The True Story of the World’s Largest Unsolved Art Theft, by Ulrich Boser. Some years later I read another book concerning the heist, Master Thieves: The Boston Gangsters Who Pulled Off the World’s Greatest Art Heist, by Stephen Kurkjian. Then came, History’s Biggest Art Heist: The largest art theft in history remains unsolved after thieves stole 13 masterpieces worth $500 million from a Boston museum. So whodunit? by Christopher Klein (https://www.history.com/news/historys-biggest-art-heist-remains-unsolved). Years later another book about the heist was published, WHITEY’S HEIST: The BREAKING of the GARDNER MUSEUM WILL an ongoing ENTERPRISE, by Jeffrey Barrett.

At Amazon one finds: “James WHITEY Bulger gave me a Gardner Museum ART HEIST interview in Waikiki, Hawaii just one month before he was arrested in California. ONLY after my death can you release this true story. Harvard orchestrated the breaking of the Isabella Stewart Gardner WILL that stipulated if anything was moved taken or sold the entire paintings and collection would be given to Harvard to be sold at their discretion. Harvard made Gardner Museum broke and in disrepair a new WILL modified deal to save it from total ruination The Gardner Family especially John Gardner gladly agreed to the new Harvard Museums/Gardner Museum Collaboration. The theft from the Blue Room of Manet’s the Chez Tortani was a key deliberate act of the Gardener Museum ensuring they were deliberately involved in the selling of that one piece of art because the thieves never entered the Blue Room that evening.”

In addition, during these years I read an article, Stéphane Breitwieser: World’s Most Notorious Art Thief (https://pursuitmag.com/stephane-breitwieser-story-worlds-notorious-art-thief/), which was so interesting I read other articles about the art thief: The Secrets of the World’s Greatest Art Thief (https://www.gq.com/story/secrets-of-the-worlds-greatest-art-thief); and, Stephane Breitwieser: The Truth About The Art Thief Who Stole $1.4 Billion (https://www.grunge.com/478873/stephane-breitwieser-the-truth-about-the-art-thief-who-stole-1-4-billion/?utm_campaign=clip).

The latest article read on the subject was: The Case of the Disputed Lucian Freud: A collector thought he had bought a painting by the celebrated British artist. How far would he go to prove it? By Sam Knight
September 19, 2022. (https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/09/26/the-case-of-the-disputed-lucian-freud)

This has been fascinating reading because, The Fake Art Industry Is Booming Online: From exhibition catalogue pages marketed as original prints to brazenly fake “authorized” copies of Harings and Warhols, we’re living in a golden age of art piracy, by Chris Cobb September 28, 2022 (https://hyperallergic.com/764867/the-fake-art-industry-is-booming-online/)

Caveat Emptor. One of the things learned is that it is extremely difficult to prosecute art thieves because it is difficult to prove what was stolen was an original work. As P.T. Barnum famously said, “There’s a sucker born every minute.”

With a background like that it should be obvious why I would look forward to reading “An Art History Mystery.”

To Kingdom Come is a very well written, and researched, book that flowed, and it was a pleasure to read. I will admit it became obvious there was some difficulty in keeping the players straight in my memory. An earlier article read stated, “One early indicator of memory issues, according to Dr. Restak, is giving up on fiction. “People, when they begin to have memory difficulties, tend to switch to reading nonfiction,” he said. “Over his decades of treating patients, Dr. Restak has noticed that fiction requires active engagement with the text, starting at the beginning and working through to the end. “You have to remember what the character did on Page 3 by the time you get to Page 11,” he said. (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/well/mind/memory-loss-prevention.html)

That sounded like me. I therefore decided to associate each different character with someone previously known, so that when they popped up again all that had to be done was to “see” the character in my mind. It worked for me…

The review will begin with what can be found at Amazon:

“Amateur sleuths, Erika Shawn-Wheatley, art magazine editor, and Harrison Wheatley, art history professor, attend a Zoom meeting of individuals from around the globe whose common goal is to expedite the return of African art looted during the colonial era. Olivia Chatham, a math instructor at London University, has just begun speaking about her recent find, a journal penned by her great-granduncle, Andrew Barrett, an active member of the Royal Army Medical Service during England’s 1897 “punitive expedition” launched against the Kingdom of Benin.

Olivia is about to disclose what she hopes the sleuthing duo will bring to light when the proceedings are disrupted by an unusual movement in one of the squares on the grid. Frozen disbelief erupts into a frenzy of calls for help as the group, including the victim, watch in horror the enactment of a murder videotaped in real time.

It will not be the only murder or act of brutality Erika and Harrison encounter in their two-pronged effort to hunt down the source of violence and unearth a cache of African treasures alluded to in Barrett’s journal.

Much of the action takes place in London, scene of the crimes and quest for redemption.” (https://www.amazon.com/Kingdom-Come-Art-History-Mystery-ebook/dp/B09Z1KFNB4/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8)

Amazon shows seven reviews of the book but only three are given, each from the United States. All three reviews are given five stars, and were written by women. The other reviews, with either four, or three stars, are from elsewhere in the world but are not shown. None of the reviews were read. To the book:

A fellow named Harrison is married to a woman, Erika, and they have a young child. Erika is the star of the book, which would have made Mother, who read all of the Perry Mason books, happy. It was obviously a man’s world ‘back in the day’ and the only woman was the secretary, Della Street. If Claudia had been writing the Perry Mason books Della would have solved the crimes.

The most disconcerting thing written in the book came out of nowhere when Harrison asks, “Erika, am I losing you?”

This was simply a non sequitur, as it came out of the blue and was totally unnecessary, other than to confirm the woman was in control and her husband nothing but ancillary. The author has turned the husband into an insecure wimp for no reason whatsoever.

“The question was an explosion, yet delivered so softly, it was as if she knew she’d been shot, but not in what part of her body.
Am I, Erika?”
She climbed back into bed and moved his laptop aside. “Where did that come from? How can you ask – how can you think that?”
“I don’t know. You have it all. Your career, our child, your breakthrough ideas, your fawning detective, lapping up your every word. What do you need me for? An occasional roll in the hay?”
She could not help laughing. Higher pitched than her usual laugh. “First of all, where did you come up with that dated expression? Second, where do you come off calling it occasional?”
“I’m serious.”
“So am I.” She was giddy, on the verge of tears. “This is coming out of nowhere. You know I love you – need you, Harrison. You fulfill me.”

Reading the above caused bile to rise up in my throat making me want to HURL!

It also caused me to wonder if that made it qualify for “Chick Lit,” which has, according to some, “fallen out of fashion with publishers while writers and critics have rejected its inherent sexism.” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick_lit#cite_note-googlewordcount-1) Has it become de rigeur for the male to be included only to protect and support the female? The pendulum has swung the other way and women are graduating from college in larger numbers than men (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/11/08/whats-behind-the-growing-gap-between-men-and-women-in-college-completion/). There has been a sea change in the number of female politicians over the past few decades. When coming of age often heard was a woman saying, “It’s a man’s world.” Has it become a “woman’s world?” I do not care to read about weak, insecure men. It is difficult to imagine Perry Mason and Paul Drake playing the parts of Harrison and John, the detective, while Della Street solves the case.

But wait, there’s more, unfortunately. Erika, who if you recall, is a young mother with a young child she has left behind in New York with not a family member, but a hired “nanny,” for who knows how long while she gallivants all over the world. From what is written it would have been much better if Harrison had been left behind in New York to care for the child because Erika is no team player as she goes off alone to catch someone who has already murdered at least once. The two men have no clue where the woman is because she gave them the slip. The book strains credulity.

After finishing the book I was left wondering… Then the page was turned and there were the “End Notes” and after reading I wondered no more as the notes brought it all together and answered the questions in my mind. The author informs the reader of how a “…reference to the Benin Bronzes sparked an idea for an art history mystery.” The author writes, “I read the reviews of books written on the Kingdom of Benin (in modern-day Nigeria!) and, more specifically, on the British “punitive expedition” of 1897, during which thousands of art and artifacts were seized from Benin City, a few in retaliation for an aggressive action that had occurred about a month earlier. Dan Hick’s The British Museums: The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution, appeared to be the most comprehensive coverage of the event and its surrounding history. I started my education with the Hicks book, and the sentence of his that most succinctly summed up the event and got my blood boiling was this:

“The sacking of Benin City in February 1897 was an attack on human life, on culture, on belief, on art, and on sovereignty.”

The author was not the only one with boiling blood. Everybody wants to rule the world. Might is right. There are untold spoils of war hidden deep in the vaults in Great Britain, and other countries, that were stolen from other countries. All of those ill-gotten gains should be returned to the countries of origin.

Oh Atlanta

The following picture greeted me this morning when I surfed on over to the website of the New York Times in an article:

Cities Lost Population in 2021, Leading to the Slowest Year of Growth in U.S. History

Although some of the fastest growing regions in the country continued to grow, the gains were nearly erased by stark losses in New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco.

Atlanta is growing, which isn’t true of other major cities. Credit…Audra Melton for The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/24/us/census-2021-population-growth.html)

‘SNL’ Opens with Emotional Performance From Ukrainian Chorus

The Ukrainian Chorus Dumka of New York sang behind a table of candles that spelled out “Kyiv”

By Ilana Kaplan

While Saturday Night Live more often than not opts for comedy in its cold open, this week, the laughter was on hold.

Given the devastating Russian-Ukrainian conflict, this week’s episode began on a somber note. The Ukrainian Chorus Dumka of New York, introduced by Kate McKinnon and Cecily Strong, performed instead. They delivered a mournful song for the audience with “Prayer for Ukraine” before the camera panned to a table of candles surrounding the name of the Ukrainian capital, “Kyiv.”

According to Ukrainian Weekly, the chorus was founded by Ukrainian immigrants in the 1940s in order to “preserve and cultivate the rich musical heritage of Ukraine.” The decision to feature an emotional tribute from the folk chorus followed the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, spearheaded by Russian President Vladimir Putin. (https://www.rollingstone.com/tv/tv-news/snl-skips-cold-open-comedy-for-tribute-to-ukraine-while-john-mulaney-enters-five-timer-club-1313279/)

Trump Lied While We The People Died

Fiddle while Rome burns

To do something trivial and irresponsible in the midst of an emergency; legend has it that while a fire destroyed the city of Rome, the emperor Nero played his violin, thus revealing his total lack of concern for his people and his empire.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/fiddle-while-rome-burns

Pelosi on Trump’s coronavirus response: ‘As the President fiddles, people are dying’

By Chandelis Duster, CNN

Updated 11:06 AM ET, Sun March 29, 2020

Washington (CNN)House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/3968b16/2147483647/resize/1160x/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F36%2F14%2F86abef4e420a8a441b069d3c5a44%2F20200329-nancy-pelosi-ap-773.jpg

on Sunday criticized President Donald Trump’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, saying “his denial at the beginning was deadly” and that as he “fiddles, people are dying.”
“We should be taking every precaution. What the President, his denial at the beginning was deadly,” Pelosi said in an exclusive interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper on “State of the Union.”
As US cases surge, Pelosi questioned when Trump was informed about the coronavirus and his knowledge on its potential impact. “I don’t know what the scientists said to him, when did this President know about this, and what did he know? What did he know and when did he know it? That’s for an after-action review. But as the President fiddles, people are dying. And we just have to take every precaution.”
Asked by Tapper if she believes Trump’s downplaying of the crisis has cost American lives, Pelosi responded, “Yes, I am. I’m saying that.”

“Because when he made the other day when he was signing the bill, he said just think 20 days ago everything was great. No, everything wasn’t great,” she said. “We had nearly 500 cases and 17 deaths already. And in that 20 days because we weren’t prepared, we now have 2,000 deaths and 100,000 cases.”

When asked about Trump suggesting he wants to relax social distancing guidelines in parts of the country, Pelosi said, “His delaying of getting equipment to where it — it continues his delay in getting equipment to where it’s needed, is deadly. And now I think the best thing would be to do is to prevent more loss of life rather than open things up, because we just don’t know.”

The bill allocates at least $1.25 billion to the states and $500 million to the District of Columbia. Some have criticized the bill, including New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. The Democratic governor was critical of the funding amount, saying the bill did not “address the revenue shortfall.”
Asked about Cuomo’s comment, Pelosi said, “We have to do more.” She called the bill “a down payment.”

“I’ve talked to the chairman of the Fed, the Federal Reserve Bank, Mr. Powell, Chairman (Jerome) Powell, and asked him to do much more because they have the authority to do so, even more authority, since we passed this bill,” she told Tapper. “But we have to pass another bill that goes to meeting the need more substantially than we have.”

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/29/politics/nancy-pelosi-coronavirus-cnntv/index.html

Barbra Streisand Talks New Album ‘Walls’ and Its Trump-Dissing Single ‘Don’t Lie to Me’

https://static.billboard.com/files/media/Barbra-Streisand-2018-cr-Russell-James-billboard-1548-1024x677.jpg?1

9/27/2018 by Joe Lynch

Barbra Streisand, an inarguable Greatest of All Time talent when it comes to the stage, screen and recording studio, returns to music on Nov. 2 with the release of a new album, Walls,

https://t2.genius.com/unsafe/220x220/https%3A%2F%2Fimages.genius.com%2Fc030631b149d1f4b7e7b5602c692bfd5.1000x1000x1.jpg

her first LP consisting primarily of original songs since 2005.

If the word “walls” makes you think of a particular sitting president’s signature campaign promise, well, take a listen to its lead single, the just-dropped “Don’t Lie to Me.” An impassioned, dramatic ballad with pointed barbs at a particular man of power who likes to “change the facts to justify” his actions, it’s hard not to read it as a dig at Trump.

“I had to write this song,” Streisand tells Billboard. “These times gave me energy.” But while Walls is inspired by the turbulent times we find ourselves in, it’s also universal, speaking to a sense of hope and resilience in the face of falsehoods and the “smoke and mirrors” described in this new single. “There’s a light coming in and hope for the future,” she says. “We have to grow as a nation.”

Just ahead of the song’s release, the icon (and we don’t use that word lightly – she’s the only recording artist to nab a No. 1 album on the Billboard 200 in six consecutive decades) hopped on the phone with Billboard to discuss why she returned to songwriting, how one of the songs on Walls is inspired by a scene from Funny Girl, what she thinks about Lady Gaga’s A Star Is Born — and why she turned down a chance to direct a remake some years ago.

https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/8477132/barbra-streisand-new-album-walls-interview

Don’t Lie to Me
Barbra Streisand
Produced by Jonas Myrin & John Shanks
Album Walls

[Verse 1]
Why can’t you just tell me the truth?
Hard to believe the things you say
Why can’t you feel the tears I cry today?
Cried today, cried today
How do you win if we all lose?
You change the facts to justify
Your lips move but your words get in the way
In the way, in the way

[Pre-Chorus]
Kings and queens, crooks and thieves
You don’t see the forest for the trees
Hand and heart, on our knees
You can’t see what we all see

[Chorus]
How do you sleep when the world keeps turning?
All that we built has come undone
How do you sleep when the world is burning?
Everyone answers to someone

[Post-Chorus]
Don’t lie to me, don’t lie to me, you lie to me
Don’t lie to me, don’t lie to me, you lie to me

[Verse 2]
You can build towers of bronze and gold
You can paint castles in the sky
You can use smoke and mirrors, old clichés
Not today, not today

[Pre-Chorus]
Kings and queens, crooks and thieves
You don’t see the forest for the trees
Hand on heart, down on knees
You can’t see what everyone sees

[Chorus]
How do you sleep when the world keeps turning?
All that we built has come undone
How do you sleep when the world is burning?
Everyone answers to someone

[Post-Chorus]
Don’t lie to me, don’t lie to me, you lie to me
Don’t lie to me, don’t lie to me, you lie to me

[Bridge]
Can’t you see I’m crying?
Can’t you see we’re crying?
Where’s the new horizon?
Where’s the new horizon?

[Hook]
How do you sleep?
How do you sleep?
How do you sleep?
How do you sleep?
(How do you sleep when the world keeps turning?
All that we built has come undone)
Enough is enough
How do you sleep?
(How do you sleep when the world is burning?
Everyone answers to someone)

[Post-Chorus]
Don’t lie to me, don’t lie to me, you lie to me
Don’t lie to me, don’t lie to me, you lie to me

[Outro]
Can’t you see I’m crying?
Can’t you see we’re crying? (Can’t you see we’re crying?)
Everyone answers to someone

https://genius.com/Barbra-streisand-dont-lie-to-me-lyrics

 

 

 

 

 

Lock Kelly Loeffler Up!

Two United States Senators, Richard Burr, from North Carolina, and Kelly Loeffler, from Georgia, both Republicans, have been caught with their hands in the proverbial cookie jar. Excerpts from an article written by The Editorial Board of the New York Times follow, with a focus on Senator Loeffler. Loeffler was appointed to the seat vacated by Johnny Isakson by the Republican Governor, Brian Kemp. Kemp obtained office by thwarting eligible voters from voting, even when called on to resign his position as Georgia’s Secretary Of State. It is the Secretary of State who controls voting, proving it’s not just who votes, but who counts the vote. (https://whowhatwhy.org/2018/11/02/its-not-just-who-votes-its-who-counts-the-votes/)
In Georgia, as in much of the South, this has just been ‘business as usual’. The woman has no background in government. Her only qualification is MONEY! I cannot help but wonder what it cost the woman to become US Senator? When the COVID-19 virus runs its course this will change because the volcano is rumbling as I write.

Kelly Loeffler should have already resigned the office of US Senator. Since she has not resigned, the woman should resign IMMEDIATELY! Read on and you will understand why…

https://www.ajc.com/rf/image_lowres/Pub/p10/AJC/2019/12/04/Images/120519%20loeffler_AP9.JPG

Kemp taps Kelly Loeffler, financial exec, to US Senate seat (https://www.ajc.com/news/state–regional-govt–politics/breaking-kemp-taps-kelly-loeffler-financial-exec-senate-seat/cKraGpntwpFivAz0kYPFkL/)

Did Richard Burr and Kelly Loeffler Profit From the Pandemic?

At least two senators engaged in suspiciously timed stock sales. All stock trades by members of Congress should be barred.

By The Editorial Board

March 20, 2020

Crisis often brings out the best in a people. As the coronavirus spreads its devastation, countless Americans are stepping up to perform acts of heroism and compassion, both great and small, to aid their neighbors and their nation.

Then there are certain not-so-inspiring members of the United States Senate.

Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina, and Kelly Loeffler, Republican of Georgia, are in the hot seat this week, facing questions about whether they misused their positions to shield their personal finances from the economic fallout of the pandemic, even as they misled the public about the severity of the crisis. According to analyses of their disclosure reports filed with the Senate, the lawmakers each unloaded major stock holdings during the same period they were receiving closed-door briefings about the looming pandemic.

These briefings were occurring when much of the public still had a poor grasp of the virus, in part because President Trump and many Republican officials were still publicly playing down the threat. Instead of raising their voices to prepare Americans for what was to come, Mr. Burr and Ms. Loeffler prioritized their stock portfolios, in a rank betrayal of the public trust — and possibly in violation of the law.

It is unclear precisely what information about the pandemic either Mr. Burr or Ms. Loeffler received in the briefings before their stock sales. But any use of nonpublic information in guiding such dealings would have been not only unethical but almost certainly illegal. Lawmakers and their aides are explicitly barred from using nonpublic information for trades by the STOCK Act of 2012 (the acronym stands for Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge). Mr. Burr of all people should know this, since he was one of only three senators to vote against the bill.

As chairman of the Intelligence Committee, Mr. Burr is privy to classified information about threats to America’s security. In February, his committee was receiving regular briefings about the coronavirus. He is also a member of the Health Committee, which, on Jan. 24, co-sponsored a private coronavirus briefing by top administration officials for all senators.

Ms. Loeffler, who also sits on the Health Committee, is in a similarly sticky situation. On the very day of the committee’s coronavirus briefing, she began her own stock sell-off, as originally reported by The Daily Beast. Over the next three weeks, she shed between $1,275,000 and $3.1 million worth of stock, much of it jointly owned with her husband, who is the chairman of the New York Stock Exchange. Of Ms. Loeffler’s 29 transactions, 27 were sales. One of her two purchases was of a technology company that provides teleworking software. That stock has appreciated in recent weeks, as so many companies have ordered employees to work from home.

Early Friday, Ms. Loeffler issued a statement asserting that neither she nor her husband is involved in managing her portfolio.

Even as she was shedding shares, Ms. Loeffler was talking down the threat of the coronavirus. “Democrats have dangerously and intentionally misled the American people on Coronavirus readiness,” she tweeted on Feb. 28, assuring the public that the president and his team “are doing a great job working to keep Americans healthy & safe.”

As anxiety spread, she talked up the economy. “Concerned about the #coronavirus?” she tweeted on March 10. “Remember this: The consumer is strong, the economy is strong & jobs are growing, which puts us in the best economic position to tackle #COVID19 & keep Americans safe.”

Faced with calls for his resignation from across the political spectrum, Mr. Burr on Friday issued a statement insisting that his stock sales had been based solely on public information and that he had asked the Senate Ethics Committee to “open a complete review of the matter with full transparency.”

There is pressure for Ms. Loeffler to step down as well, and the recent stock dealings of other senators are now being dissected — as well they should be.

One might have expected lawmakers to be more circumspect about even the appearance of self-dealing after what happened to the Republican Chris Collins, the former congressman from New York, who was sentenced to 26 months in prison earlier this year after pleading guilty to insider trading charges. While at a White House picnic in June 2017, Mr. Collins repeatedly called to alert his son that a small pharmaceutical company in which the family was deeply invested had failed a critical drug trial. Based on the not-yet-public information, Mr. Collins’s son unloaded his holdings in the company, avoiding hundreds of thousands of dollars in losses.

“What I’ve done has marked me for life,” Mr. Collins said tearfully at his sentencing hearing in January.

Apparently, more needs to be done to protect lawmakers from themselves. Last May, two Democratic senators, Jeff Merkley of Oregon and Sherrod Brown of Ohio, introduced legislation requiring members to place personal investments in a blind trust, or hold off on making any trades, during their time in office. They would also be prohibited from serving on corporate boards.

There may, of course, be perfectly reasonable explanations for what, initially, appears to be illegal — and morally reprehensible — behavior. Mr. Burr and Ms. Loeffler deserve the opportunity to provide those explanations. The Senate should initiate an ethics investigation of all accusations, and, if warranted, refer relevant findings for criminal prosecution

That said, explicit criminality aside, the real scandal here is the way in which these public servants misled an already anxious and confused public. In times of crisis, the American people need leaders who will rise to the occasion, not sink to their own mercenary interests.

Jimmy Carter Calls For Georgia Secretary Of State’s Resignation In Personal Plea

https://www.npr.org/2018/10/29/661727605/jimmy-carter-calls-for-georgia-secretary-of-states-resignation-in-personal-plea

Sen. Kelly Loeffler denies allegations of insider trading

https://www.fox5atlanta.com/news/sen-kelly-loeffler-denies-allegations-of-insider-trading

Potential conflicts of interest pose test for Kelly Loeffler, new Georgia senator

https://www.ajc.com/news/national-govt–politics/super-swampy-kelly-loeffler-faces-tricky-ethical-dilemma-senator/kigrORhkXTkRNkNmESAIKL/

Sen. Kelly Loeffler Dumped Millions in Stock After Coronavirus Briefing

https://www.thedailybeast.com/sen-kelly-loeffler-dumped-millions-in-stock-after-coronavirus-briefing

 

U.N. Laughs at US

Trump touts his own achievements, and the U.N. laughs

President Trump addresses the 73rd session of the U.N. General Assembly in New York on Tuesday. (Photo: Timothy A. Clary/AFP/Getty Images)

President Trump on Tuesday strode to the podium at the United Nations General Assembly in New York City to “share the extraordinary progress” the U.S. has made during his time in office. The reaction he received from the assembled world leaders wasn’t what he was expecting.

“In less than two years, my administration has accomplished more than almost any administration in the history of our country,” Trump proclaimed. There was a smattering of audible laughter from the assembled diplomats, representing 193 countries.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-touts-achievements-u-n-laughs-153255266.html

Donald Trump bragged about himself to the United Nations. The UN laughed.

Analysis by Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large
Updated 3:42 PM ET, Tue September 25, 2018

(CNN) President Donald Trump’s touting of how his administration has accomplished more than any — yes, any — past administration in its first two years is one of his most consistent applause lines in his campaign patter.
“I don’t believe there has been any administration in the history of this country that has done more in two years — and we’re not even up to two years yet — than our administration,” Trump said last week during a campaign speech in Las Vegas — while reading a literal paper list of those accomplishments.
“Nobody has done what this administration has done in terms of getting things passed and getting things through,” he told a group of sheriffs earlier this month.

His supporters love the line: Despite all of the losers and haters, Trump is MAGA-ing!

Which brings us to Tuesday morning — and Trump’s speech to the United Nations General Assembly in New York.
“In less than two years, my administration has accomplished more than almost any administration in the history of our country,” Trump said, as he does.
“So true,” said Trump, clearly caught by surprise by the laughter. “I didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK,” he added to more laughter and some applause.

Before we go any further let me be clear: I wasn’t in the room. I was watching it live on TV from Washington. But, watching on television, the perception of those few seconds was clear: The gathered world leaders — or at least some of them — were laughing at Trump’s contention that he had done more in two years than any previous American administration ever.
Which makes some sense given that the claim seems, on its face ridiculous.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/25/politics/donald-trump-un-speech-laugh/index.html